The Yellow men was a project developed by performance artists Jed
McMannon and Clarke Hegan throughout 2011. The then second year Dunedin
school of art students devised the project with the ambitious intention
of doing a weekly performance for the duration of an hour for the entire
year. The performance was an ever evolving process of experimentation
and took place at the centre of the main corridor of the Art school. The
project’s name comes from McMannon & Hegan’s trademark yellow
‘uniforms’, which instantly made them recognizable
The project began after both discussed their mutual interest in
endurance based performance works, particularly the work of seminal
performance artist Chris Burden. Burden’s work is marked by both his
endurance based performances, but also mortal danger and physical pain.
While the McMannon & Hegan were interested in creating endurance
based works, their interest lay primarily with the subsequent experience
of pain. Rather than doing an action which would be purposefully
harmful to themselves they sought to reach a point of uncomfortable
pain.
By choosing to stage such performances in a public space McMannon and
Hegan were also engaging with art historical references to controversies
involving art in the public sphere, most notably Richard Serra’s
seminal Tilted Arc (1981). Tilted Arc was a public sculpture
commissioned by the United States General Services Administration’s
Arts-in-Architecture program for the Federal Plaza in New York, NY, USA.
After intense public debate the work was controversially dismantled in
1989. Both artists agree that while the work was a successful sculpture,
it did not succeed as a public sculpture, due to the fact of the
environment in which it was placed. The work obstructed the path of
those who had to interact with it daily. The yellow men project was
founded upon this idea of obstructing the unknowing viewer’s path and
thus forcing them to both engage and participate in each of their works
however fleeting this engagement may have been. In doing this the Yellow
men project was perhaps subconsciously aligning themselves also with
the ‘Living sculpture’ works by Gilbert and George. This kind of
confrontation had a varied response, but by the mere ritual of having to
do a weekly performance this enabled both artists to refine their
practice in the safety of the institution.
At the Qubit contemporary performance series at the Anteroom gallery,
the Yellow men performed for the first time in a gallery space, with
interesting results. Blow consisted of the simple act of blowing up an
inflatable swimming pool and deflating it over and over again. This
mundane act challenged the viewer’s engagement simply for the fact that
the viewer immediately became aware of what both artists were doing and
largely disengaged. Did it change? Or did it largely remain the same?
This subtle performance did change over time, with both their bodies
twisting and contorting through the uncomfortable process of squeezing
air out of their lungs. Blow gradually became more physically grueling
for both artists. But because of the majority of audience’s
disengagement did this mean that the performance lost meaning, because
of it’s repetitive nature? Or was it success in proving that repeating
the same action can dislocate meaning? Wet, the second performance by
the Yellow men initiated a completely different response, although it
largely followed the same principal. It was utterly gut wrenchingly
difficult and captivating to watch. Wet involved both McMannon and Hegan
filling the paddling pool used in Blow with water. Then both artists
sat cross legged in the pool, faced each other and then took turns at
pours cups of water on each other’s heads. At first the atmosphere
within the gallery was that of disengagement, but as the performance
progressed the room became transfixed by the figures before us, as we
watched them shiver in a self-perpetuated agony. I wanted to make them
stop and drag them out and shove blankets on them, but I sat and watched
this silent ritual and mediated upon the associations of such an
action. My immediate response was that it reminded me of the process of
baptism. It also communicated a collective frustration at both wanting
to make the performance stop, yet remaining absolutely magnetically
glued to their every movement.
Currently both artists are working on individual projects, with both
continuing to look at both ritual and endurance based performances. They
will both also be a part of a group show reconceptualising the current
Mural show of New Zealand expressionist works, curated by Aaron Kreisler
and Fiona O’Connor at the Dunedin Public art gallery in June.